Bulletin Board - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment".
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments click on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
Your connection may time out due to inactivity. To avoid losing your comments, we suggest:
-
Do not jump between web pages/applications or log comments for more than one document at a time.
-
Do not leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
Do not exit until you have completed all three stages of the submission process. Your feedback will not be saved until you prove you are human.
(1) Charles Darwin University (‘the University’, ‘CDU’) is committed to maximising the public value of its research outputs and supporting researchers in enhancing their scholarly profiles. This commitment is realised through the deposit of scholarly outputs (including datasets) in the University’s institutional repository, ensuring broad accessibility and long-term preservation. (2) In accordance with the Open Access Policy, the (3) This document outlines the procedure for depositing scholarly outputs, as defined in the Open Access Policy, in the University’s institutional repository. (4) This procedure applies to all University staff, Higher Degree by Research candidates and adjuncts and honorary appointees, where attribution is appropriate. (5) University scholarly outputs must be submitted into the University’s institutional repository for preservation and open access in accordance with the University’s Open Access Policy. (6) The University encourages the deposit of other works such as grey literature, works produced by staff prior to joining the University, and special collection materials or materials with cultural or historical significance. (7) The Research Outputs team, in consultation with researchers, will ensure that scholarly outputs deposited into the institutional repository will be made publicly accessible, as far as technical, copyright, privacy and contract restrictions allow. Publications that contain material to be commercialised, confidential or culturally sensitive information, or where the availability of the publication would infringe a legal requirement by the University and/or the author/s, are excluded from the procedure. Where scholarly outputs are not able to be deposited or made open access, the University will maintain metadata records for these outputs. (8) Where clarification is required as to how this procedure may be implemented in particular circumstances, advice should be sought from the Research Outputs team prior to submitting research outputs for publication. (9) The University encourages the deposit of scholarly outputs into the University’s institutional repository at the time of submission of the accepted version of a manuscript to a publisher. The accepted version of a scholarly output must be deposited even if this version will not become openly accessible. (10) Scholarly outputs may be deposited by upload to the institutional repository or by email to research.outputs@cdu.edu.au. (11) In cases of multiple authorship, the first CDU author must deposit a copy of the accepted version to the institutional repository by self-service upload or emailing the Research Outputs team at research.outputs@cdu.edu.au. (12) Further information can be found in the Strategic Publishing library guide. (13) The Research Outputs team will assist the researchers and the Menzies School of Health Research administration with: (14) Researchers must ensure that publications arising from ARC or NHMRC funded projects are made openly accessible in accordance with the relevant funder Open Access policies, including depositing Author Accepted Manuscripts in an institutional repository (green OA), applying any required licensing, and making metadata publicly available within the required period. (15) Higher Degree by Research students should forward electronic copies of theses and the CDU Thesis Deposit Agreement to the Research Outputs team in accordance with the Higher Degree by Research – Preparation, Submission and Examinations Procedure. Once processed, the Research Output team will upload the electronic copy of the thesis and the CDU Thesis Deposit Agreement to the institutional repository. (16) Deposited outputs will be archived in the institutional repository for future reference and will only be made available on open access after the publisher embargo or other copyright requirements have been met. (17) Self-service depositing enables self-archiving and provides authors a form to record specific access details and publication agreements. (18) The Research Outputs team will check for embargo and copyright compliance before making the final record Open Access. (19) The Research Outputs team will provide information and advice to authors to support the deposit of scholarly outputs, including: (20) The version of record of a scholarly work may be deposited in the institutional repository in addition to the accepted version. (21) Depositing an item into the institutional repository does not affect copyright. The Research Outputs team will ensure material in the institutional repository complies with copyright and publisher agreements before making them publicly available. (22) Where an embargo period is imposed by copyright owners, authors and creators can still deposit research materials in the institutional repository. The Research Outputs team will ensure closed access pending the expiry of embargo periods and other legal obligations, then automatically make the materials visible and accessible in the institutional repository at the end of the embargo period. (23) Research data and primary research materials will only be made open access to the public with the permission of the owner of the research material. Authors and creators are responsible for confirming that deposited material in the institutional repository does not breach any agreement made with a third party in relation to the copyright. Where possible, the Research Outputs team will provide a link from the metadata to the article’s location on the publisher's site. (24) The Research Outputs team will check that the publisher allows author self-archiving before uploading deposited material to the institutional repository. (25) In cases where a publisher does not permit self-archiving, depositors will be required to gain permission to deposit their material in the institutional repository. (26) If there is any dispute over the appearance of a publication in the institutional repository, the Research Outputs team will remove the item until the dispute is resolved. (27) If this permission is not provided, a full copy of the research material will not be accepted; however, a record of the publication metadata, including bibliographic information, must be provided. (28) Non-compliance with (29) Complaints may be raised in accordance with the Complaints and Grievance Policy and Procedure - Employees and Complaints Policy - Students. (30) All staff members have an individual responsibility to raise any suspicion, allegation or report of fraud or corruption in accordance with the Fraud and Corruption Control Policy and Whistleblower Reporting (Improper Conduct) Procedure. (31) Accepted version means a manuscript that has been corrected after peer review and sent to a publisher for publication, including all changes made as a result of the peer review process, but excluding any editing, typesetting or other changes made by the journal or publisher. This is also known as a post-print. Sometimes a publisher may ask for further editing to an accepted version. For the purposes of deposit with the institutional repository, only the initial accepted version is required. (32) Grey literature means informally published written material such as reports, patents, and technical reports from government agencies or scientific research groups, working papers from research groups or committees, and white papers. (33) Institutional repository means the software system for centralising, preserving and disseminating in electronic form, the knowledge generated by the University. The institutional repository is distinct from other services such as student course work, which operate on the same software. (34) Metadata means the structured description of bibliographic data such as the title and authorship of a resource, for example, book, article, image or video in an institutional repository. (35) Open access means the availability of publications via the internet, such that any user can find, freely access, read, share, and reuse the publication. Sharing and reuse is facilitated through open licensing. (36) Publisher version or published version means the formally published version of a research output that includes publisher contributed copy-editing, proof corrections, layout, and typesetting. This is also known as the Version of Record. A publisher normally sends a copy of the publisher version to the author and this is known as the author version or author record. (37) Research data means all data which is created by researchers in the course of their work, and for which the institution has a curatorial responsibility for at least as long as the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2018 and relevant archives/record keeping acts require, and third-party data which may have originated within the institution or come from elsewhere. (38) Research Outputs team means the team of Library and Office of Research and Innovation staff responsible for the management of the University’s institutional repository. (39) Scholarly output means original intellectual work that is validated by peers where at least one of the authors or creators of the research output or other eligible type of material is a University staff member or postgraduate student at the time of the deposit or at the time the work was produced. (40) Submitted version means a manuscript that has been sent to a publisher for consideration prior to peer-review and/or placed on a pre-print server for academic discussion. This is also referred to as a pre-print. (41) Version of record is the peer-reviewed, edited, formatted, and typeset version of the article, including any tagging, indexing, and other enhancements from a publisher. This is also known as the publisher or published version. A publisher normally sends a copy of the version of record to the author and this is known as the author version or author record.Institutional Repository Procedure
Definitions
Accepted version
Grey literature
Institutional repository
Metadata
Open access
Publisher version
Research data
Research Outputs team
Scholarly output
Submitted version
Version of record
Section 1 - Preamble
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Procedure
Depositing scholarly outputs
ARC and NHMRC open access compliance
Submission of HDR theses
Research Outputs support
Copyright
Embargo periods
Publisher permissions
Section 5 - Non-Compliance
Section 6 - Definitions