(1) The University recognises the importance of employees having access to processes that provide a consistent approach to the resolution of workplace complaints and grievances within a supportive environment. (2) Grievances should be raised promptly without the fear of reprisal or victimisation. Employees are encouraged to resolve their concerns and address conflicts as early as possible to achieve a positive and professional workplace culture. (3) This is a compliance requirement under the Charles Darwin University Act 2003 part 3 Section 15. (4) This document outlines the University’s process for managing employee grievances and resolving conflict in the workplace, including conduct that may constitute a breach of the University’s workplace policies, including, but not limited to the University’s Code of Conduct and Charles Darwin University and Union Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Enterprise Agreement). (5) In the context of this document: (6) There are four options available to employees to assist them in resolving grievances, these are: (7) If at any time an employee would like to understand their options or consider how best to approach a grievance, they should speak with their supervisor or the HR Business Partnering Unit. (8) While an employee may choose to follow a given option to resolve their grievance, this does not mean they are unable to pursue resolution of their grievance through other options. For example, where it has not been possible to resolve the grievance or where the seriousness of the matter escalates. (9) Note: The University reserves the right to act, as it deems necessary where: (10) If an employee is comfortable doing so, they should try to resolve their grievance directly with the person/s concerned as soon as possible. Grievances should be addressed, making sure to: (11) It may be that the person was unaware of the effect of their behaviour or actions. If an employee is not sure how to resolve their grievance, they may approach a member of the HR Business Partnering Unit for a confidential discussion. Diary notes of any attempts to address the grievance are recommended. (12) If an employee is not comfortable attempting to resolve the grievance directly with the person/s concerned, or if self-management is not successful, local and formal resolution methods are available. (13) The local resolution process emphasises resolution rather than factual proof of a grievance. It is suited to assisting employees to resolve grievances such as interpersonal conflict and disagreements. (14) This process focuses on flexibility and aims to reach an outcome where parties can continue to work together in a professional and courteous manner. The length of the process may vary depending upon the nature of the grievance and the parties involved. (15) Employees wanting to start a local resolution process should contact their immediate supervisor. If an employee is seeking to resolve a grievance that involves their immediate supervisor, the employee should contact the next senior manager in their reporting structure. If an employee is unsure who to contact, they should speak with a member of the HR Business Partnering Unit. (16) Possible outcomes of local resolution may include, but are not limited to: (17) The supervisor handling the grievance is responsible for determining the appropriate action required to resolve the matter. Any agreed actions and associated timelines must be documented and securely stored by the supervisor and followed up with the parties involved. This will identify if further action is required. (18) If the employee feels that their complaint is not being adequately resolved or addressed, they may elevate the matter to a formal resolution process at any time. Once a formal process commences, the local resolution process will stop. If action items identified during the local resolution process are still considered appropriate e.g. training, mentoring, these may still proceed. (19) Information collected during the local resolution process may be provided to the case manager handling the formal resolution process. (20) Where the grievance is not resolved at a local level or is of a more serious nature, such as sexual harassment, a formal resolution may be undertaken. Employees should note that grievances of a serious nature are the responsibility of everyone to report. (21) Employees should make their complaint in writing or approach the HR Business Partnering Unit, who will discuss the grievance with the employee and assist them to produce a signed statement of complaint. However, a complaint does not need to be in writing for it to be investigated. Once a formal complaint is made whether written or verbal, the complaint must be addressed. It is the University’s duty of care to investigate or take action particularly where there is a potential breach of any legislation, or there is potential harm to a person occurring. (22) Upon receipt of a formal employee grievance, a case manager will be appointed to undertake an initial review and assessment in accordance with the provision of this procedure. (23) The case manager may arrange to meet with the employee to undertake a formal interview and/or discuss the grievance in detail to understand the specific issues and desired outcomes. Employees should be aware that information and allegations they disclose as part of their grievance may be put to the respondent. The case manager may make the following recommendations: (24) Should a formal investigation be recommended, an investigating officer will be appointed. The case manager may also act as the investigating officer. The investigating officer may interview and collect statements from parties associated with the grievance, witnesses and any others who may have information relevant to the investigation. As part of the formal investigation process, it may be necessary to disclose details of the grievance to other parties including but not limited to: the respondent, identified witnesses or third parties where matters are subject to court or Fair Work Commission information requests. (25) The employee and the respondent will have an opportunity to contribute information during the investigation process. (26) It is an expectation of the University that employees participate in formal investigation processes as required and answer all questions truthfully to the best of their knowledge. If an employee is found to have deliberately withheld or provided false or misleading information appropriate disciplinary action may be taken. (27) Where appropriate the University may opt to appoint an external investigator, the investigator will adhere to all University policy and procedures. The Director People and Culture is responsible for determining if it is appropriate to engage an external investigator, and for the identification and engagement of an appropriate person who holds no conflicts of interest. If the Director People and Culture is party to the grievance, this responsibility will fall to the Director, Strategic Services and Governance. (28) As appropriate, risks or issues identified may be communicated to the decision maker/s along with options to consider. This may include consideration of training activities, team building, coaching, formal instructions, performance management, investigations or other formal intervention. (29) Possible outcomes of a formal investigation may include, but are not limited to: (30) An employee wanting to make or who is lodging a formal complaint will have their request or complaint acknowledged within three (3) working days of receipt by People and Culture. (31) Employee grievances are often complex and multifaceted, and therefore timeframes surrounding management of the complaint may vary from case to case. However, timely responses by all parties involved are important during the grievance process. (32) Throughout the formal resolution process, the case manager or investigating officer will maintain regular contact with the employee, respondent and any other involved parties. (33) At all times, all employees party to the employee grievance process including parties to the grievance, witnesses, supervisors, and People and Culture are expected to treat these matters with confidentiality, sensitivity and impartiality. Failure to do so may result in disciplinary action. Confidentiality is not guaranteed where it is required to disclose details of a grievance to other parties to assist with grievance resolution or if required by law. (34) The supervisor, or person receiving the staff grievance, may be obliged to report the matter to their senior manager and/or People and Culture, or the Police. If this is the case, the employee must be advised of this and the reasons for doing so. Examples may include, but are not limited to: (35) An employee should be aware that to address a grievance it may be necessary to disclose the identity of the employee to the respondent to ensure adherence to the principles of natural justice. As part of the initial assessment, the case manager will discuss any requests for anonymity and explore whether they are feasible. (36) All grievances will be assumed to have been raised in good faith. If following initial assessment or further investigation, it is found that a grievance has been raised with malicious or vexatious intent, it may be considered misconduct and referred for further action under the Enterprise Agreement. (37) An employee may withdraw or cease their grievance at any stage of a local or formal resolution process. To do so, the employee must notify their supervisor, or senior manager where appropriate, and People and Culture in writing. (38) Following receipt of a written request to withdraw or cease, the appropriate manager in consultation with the case manager will consider whether the University cease or continue the process to address the matters raised in the grievance. This may include circumstances where an employee has ceased to be employed by the University. (39) If the appropriate manager and case manager recommend the grievance should continue to be investigated the case manager will notify the Director People and Culture whose responsibility it is to make the determination. (40) The University has separate procedures for handling allegations of unsatisfactory performance, student and research misconduct, disciplinary processes and resolution of disputes arising out of the Enterprise Agreement or National Employment Standards. If the case manager determines the matters raised in the grievance falls into one of the above categories, the employee will be advised to forward the grievance to the person responsible for managing the matter under the relevant procedure. (41) Non-compliance with Governance Documents is considered a breach of the Code of Conduct – Staff or the Code of Conduct – Students, as applicable, and is treated seriously by the University. Reports of concerns about non-compliance will be managed in accordance with the applicable disciplinary procedures outlined in the Charles Darwin University and Union Enterprise Agreement 2022 and the Code of Conduct – Students. (42) Complaints may be raised in accordance with the Complaints Procedure - Staff and Complaints Policy - Students. (43) All staff members have an individual responsibility to raise any suspicion, allegation or report of fraud or corruption in accordance with the Fraud and Corruption Control Policy and Whistleblower Reporting (Improper Conduct) Procedure.Complaints Procedure - Staff
Section 1 - Introduction
Section 2 - Compliance
Section 3 - Intent
Section 4 - Relevant Definitions
Top of PageSection 5 - Procedures
Self-Management
Local Resolution
Formal Resolution
Timeframes and Maintaining Contact
Confidentiality
Anonymity
Malicious and/or Vexatious Grievances
Withdrawal of Grievance
Excluded Complaints
Section 6 - Non-Compliance
View Current
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.