Bulletin Board - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment".
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments click on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
Your connection may time out due to inactivity. To avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries, we suggest:
-
Do not jump between web pages/applications or log comments for more than one document at a time.
-
Do not leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
Do not exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) Charles Darwin University (‘the University’, ‘CDU’) believes in the transformative power of research to change people's lives for the better. The (2) Research units are focal points of scholarly activity that: (3) This policy and procedure set out the principles and framework for establishing, operating, reviewing, and disestablishing organisational research units. (4) This policy applies to research units and employees of the (5) This policy does not apply to: (6) Each research unit will be housed within one (1) designated (7) Research projects conducted within research units will be funded externally. The University will provide support for non-project expenses including research support, infrastructure and overheads, and block grant investment. (8) Research units may draw academic membership from several (9) Research units will not be established to conduct one or a few research projects. Rather, they will facilitate collaborative endeavour in an area of strength through a sustained program of collective research activity that could not ordinarily be achieved within existing University structures. (10) Research units can be nested within each other, for example, a tier 2 unit (a centre) may sit within a tier 1 unit (an institute). (11) Research units are differentiated according to their scale, breadth and expected longevity: (12) A research institute assembles a large group of researchers (generally more than 10 FTE) whose academic disciplines collectively represent a body of expertise that is important to the Northern Territory. (13) Research institutes undertake large-scale programs of research in areas of strategic importance, collaborate extensively with external parties (including stakeholders and end users), attract substantial research funding and HDRs, and produce publications that are above world standard. (14) Research institutes provide a vibrant research environment that supports the productivity of researchers across all career stages, including HDRs. (15) A research centre assembles a smaller group of researchers (generally at least 5 FTE) working collaboratively in an area of strategic importance to the interests of the Northern Territory. (16) Research centres undertake impactful research that is focussed on the facilitation of meaningful partnerships with external stakeholders, the production of publications that are above world standard, and the attraction of external funding. (17) Research centres provide a supportive research environment that encourages and enables collaboration and attracts HDRs (18) A tier 3 research unit – named hub, lab/laboratory, program, unit, network, community of practice, or special interest group – assembles a small group of researchers with a common interest in an area of emerging strength. (19) Tier 3 units act as incubators and are established for a short term (up to three years). (20) All research units must follow the establishment process relevant to their tier. (21) An institute is established by the Vice-Chancellor on the recommendation of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection, following receipt of endorsement from the Research Committee and Senior Executive Team. (22) A request to establish an institute must be made in the form specified and include the following: (23) A research centre is established by the Vice-Chancellor on the recommendation of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection and the relevant Faculty Pro Vice-Chancellor following receipt of endorsement from the Research Committee. (24) A request to establish a research centre must be made in the form specified and include the following: (25) A flexible unit is established by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection on the recommendation of a Faculty Pro Vice-Chancellor following receipt of endorsement from the Research Committee. (26) A request to establish a flexible unit must be made by means of a business case that outlines: (27) Proposals to upgrade an existing research unit to a higher tier will follow the process described above but must be preceded by a recommendation to upgrade from a review conducted in the 12 months prior to submission to the Research Committee. (28) Tier 1 research units must establish an advisory committee or board including several external members who provide guidance to the research institute’s leadership and the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection on strategic directions including funding sustainability, end-users’ needs, and emerging opportunities. Terms of reference of the advisory committee are approved by the Research Committee. (29) Tier 1 and 2 research units must establish a management committee to oversee planning and operations for grant applications, quality of research, recruitment of HDRs, outreach activities, and management of the research unit’s membership. TOR approved by the director. (30) All research units must operate in accordance with all University (31) A research unit must include a group of research active staff members that fulfils the following requirements to achieve and maintain active status: (32) All research units must support the University’s research positioning including a presence on the University’s website, in capability statements, and other promotional material and channels. (33) All research units must have a leader, director, or other identified person who accepts responsibility for oversighting all activities of the unit, and who is the point of contact between the research unit and the University. If no leader is currently appointed the role is undertaken by the Faculty Pro Vice-Chancellor or, for nested research units, the director of the host research unit. (34) The leader of a tier 1 or tier 2 research unit will be appointed by the Vice-Chancellor in consultation with the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection and the relevant Faculty Pro Vice-Chancellor. The leader is responsible to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection for the conduct of activities within the research unit and for maintaining active status. (35) Leaders of tier 3 units are appointed by the Faculty Pro Vice-Chancellor. (36) Research units will maintain a list of members whose affiliation with the unit is captured in the Research Information System (RIS). (37) A research unit may establish membership categories. (38) The management committee, for tier 1 and 2 units, or the leader or director, for tier 3 units, will: (39) Tier 1 and tier 2 research units must submit, before the end of each calendar year, an annual report to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection covering the research activities and operations of the unit during the previous year. Research and Innovation will provide a template that specifies information to be provided at the beginning of the year. Annual reports will be tabled with the Research Committee. (40) Tier 3 research units must submit a brief annual report and plan to the Faculty Pro Vice-Chancellor and the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection in a timely manner. (41) Tier 1 and 2 research units will undergo reviews at least every 5 years. (42) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection will provide oversight and guidance for the reviews. (43) Reviews will be undertaken against specified terms of reference that will include: (44) The outcome of a review will be one of the following recommendations: (45) Tier 3 research units will undergo internal review after 3 years to determine their growth and associated viability to continue in some other form, or disestablishment. The process will be determined by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Community Connection. (46) Non-compliance with (47) Complaints may be raised in accordance with the Complaints and Grievance Policy and Procedure - Employees and Complaints Policy - Students. (48) All staff members have an individual responsibility to raise any suspicion, allegation or report of fraud or corruption in accordance with the Fraud and Corruption Control Policy and Whistleblower Reporting (Improper Conduct) Procedure.Research Unit Policy and Procedure
Section 1 - Preamble
Top of PageSection 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Top of PageSection 4 - Policy
Principles
Categories of research units
Tier 1 – research institute
Tier 2 – research centre
Tier 3 – flexible units
Section 5 - Procedure
Establishment
Tier 1 – research institute
Tier 2 – research centre
Tier 3 – flexible units
Upgrading an existing research unit
Governance and management
Active status
Leadership
Membership
Reporting
Review
Section 6 - Non-Compliance